At 8:03 AM -0700 9/4/02, Erik Steven Harrison wrote:
>
>--
>
>On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 07:45:37
> Sean O'Rourke obviated:
>To me a language's grammar, once
>>defined, shouldn't do a lot of changing, internally or otherwise. When
>>was the last time C's grammar changed? Or even gcc's implementation
--
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 07:45:37
Sean O'Rourke obviated:
To me a language's grammar, once
>defined, shouldn't do a lot of changing, internally or otherwise. When
>was the last time C's grammar changed? Or even gcc's implementation of
>it?
Granted . . .mostly. Were talking about Perl, the
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Erik Steven Harrison wrote:
> How are we planning on dealing with this, or do the
> implementers consider it a non issue?
Well, to me this is a non-Yet issue, but a very real issue. I'm hoping
that when Perl 6 goes 1.0, the grammar will have seen a lot of testing,
and will be
It seems to me that what I mostly do is wave my arms
about my head with a concern and then stay silent
whenever praise is required. Everyone - consider
yourselves praised :-)
On to the concern (which I am fairly confident someone
will obviate). I've never touched the Perl internals
(and P5P
