piece of work, really excellent!
Richard
Mark Lentczner wrote:
Friends -
Just a note to let you know that the third version of the Periodic
Table of the Operators is complete:
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/periodic/
Thanks again to all those who helped me dive deep into perl6
Friends -
Just a note to let you know that the third version of the Periodic
Table of the Operators is complete:
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/periodic/
Thanks again to all those who helped me dive deep into perl6.
- MtnViewMark
Mark Lentczner
http://www.ozonehouse.com
[Rod == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:10:34 -0500]
Jared> I haven't yet seen an example presented where using a Unicode
Jared> operator would save keystrokes, for instance.
Rod> That depends entirely on how you plan to generate them. If you
Rod> are relying on a special command in your
Jared Rhine wrote:
I haven't yet seen an example presented where using a Unicode
operator would save keystrokes, for instance.
That depends entirely on how you plan to generate them. If you are
relying on a special command in your editor of choice, yes, the ASCII
equiv is fewer keystrokes. If, ho
[Pedro == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:40:27 +0200]
Pedro> What advantages have to use characters not in standard
Pedro> keyboards?
Flexibility.
Stylistic choice.
There is More Than One Way To Do It.
Power.
Expressiveness.
Everything that makes Perl good.
Pedro> Isn't it a little sc
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 03:40:27AM +0200, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> What advantages have to use characters not in standard keyboards? Isn't
> it a little scary?
Well, what do you consider a 'standard' keyboard? The zip
operator/Yen sign probably appears on most keyboards in Japan, but on
very few i
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 03:33:34PM +, Smylers wrote:
> Gabriel Ebner writes:
>
> > Joe Gottman wrote:
> >
> > >The zip operator is now the Yen sign (¥).
> >
> > How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
>
> Probably the same way as those with US keyboards do -- US keybo
Tim Bunce skribis 2004-06-08 11:30 (+0100):
> I can recommend PuTTY for windows. Secure, small[1], fast, featureful
> and free: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/
> [1] So small it easily fits on a floppy. I keep a copy on my USB memory drive.
So small that even on modem lines, you
On Tue 08 Jun 2004 12:35, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:52:32PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > But when I'm using a
> > > terminal session,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:52:32PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > But when I'm using a
> > terminal session, I have found that the only practical way of getting
> > consistent behaviou
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:52:32PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> My console can be any of several platforms - in the last couple of weeks
> it has been a Linux box, a Windows PC, a Mac, a Sun workstation, and a
> real vt320 attached to a Sun. My mail sits on a hosted Linux box. To
> read i
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On 2004-06-07 at 21:33:03, David Cantrell wrote:
This is what is so wrong about allowing unicode operators - yes, I don't
need to write them, but if some other programmer writes one I have to be
able to read it. And I can't.
Well, for one thing, just because your email program
On 2004-06-07 at 21:33:03, David Cantrell wrote:
> This is what is so wrong about allowing unicode operators - yes, I don't
> need to write them, but if some other programmer writes one I have to be
> able to read it. And I can't.
Well, for one thing, just because your email program doesn't let
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:21:14PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Since you've added ? and ? to the list above, I'll add them as well:
What's so hard to type about the question mark? And what's so
significant that you added it twice?
OK, so I know that you really meant to type and
.
This is wha
So is he going to backport his representational ideography to
the operators of perl 5.8?
Darren Duncan wrote:
Mark Lentczner has just (on May 26/28) created a useful/humerous
graphical diagram of the 100+ operators in the Perl 6 language, designed
to look like the periodic table of atomic element
On 2004-06-01 at 14:10:08, Paul Seamons wrote:
> Or for the few Perl emacs people out there:
>
> C-x 8 Y
> C-x 8 <
> C-x 8 >
I suspect there are more than a "few". I don't think there's anything
constitutional about folks who like Emacs that prevents them from liking
Perl or vice-versa. Even t
Or for the few Perl emacs people out there:
C-x 8 Y
C-x 8 <
C-x 8 >
Paul
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 10:27 am, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it.
>
> Sorry, mistakenly picked an US-International chart.
>
> > Second, you're no
Hello,
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it.
Sorry, mistakenly picked an US-International chart.
> Second, you're not supposed to.
So why has it been chosen then?
> Â is a shorthand for "zip",
Good to know.
> and if you don't want to use the funky one-char
Hello,
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> I assume you mean "with" a US keyboard? US keyboards don't have Â.
Oops, must have mistakenly picked an US-International chart, sorry.
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 19:04, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joe Gottman wrote:
> >The zip operator is now the Yen sign (¥).
>
> How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it. Second, you're not
supposed to. ¥ is a shorthand fo
> >>How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
I assume you mean "with" a US keyboard? US keyboards don't have ¥.
You can use " zip " if you want ASCII. Otherwise, it depends. But Yen is
Unicode codepoint U+00A5 = 165 decimal, so you can type it in Windows as ALT +
numpad 0165
Smylers wrote:
Gabriel Ebner writes:
Joe Gottman wrote:
The zip operator is now the Yen sign (¥).
How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
On Windows you can probably press Alt Gr then type in some number.
Close. AltGr-Minus. If you're using the US-Interna
Gabriel Ebner writes:
> Joe Gottman wrote:
>
> >The zip operator is now the Yen sign (¥).
>
> How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
Probably the same way as those with US keyboards do -- US keyboards
don't have a yen symbol on them either.
In 'Vim' I got lucky in guess
It probably depends on what nationality that keyboard is for. If its
Japanese, you probably won't have a problem ;-).
But for the rest of us, use Vi and Ye (or zip).
Dave.
"Gabriel Ebner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
> Joe Gottman wrote:
> >The zip o
Hello,
Joe Gottman wrote:
>The zip operator is now the Yen sign (Â).
How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lentczner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 7:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Periodic Table of the Operators
>
> Not to beat a dead horse, but
>
> I've updated the Periodic table
Not to beat a dead horse, but
I've updated the Periodic table with almost all the changes that people
here sent me, as well as reading a few more threads and references.
This will be the last update for some time. I'll be uploading a
version to cafepress so people can get posters, tee-shir
Thanks for all the comments. I started this thing as a goof, but I can
already see that it will serve dual purposes. Presenting information
in such a form can lead people to further insights and questions.
Deborah Pickett's comments in this thread are an example. (For some
real inspiring ex
Le Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:34:32AM +0200, le valeureux mongueur Gabriel Ebner a dit:
> Hello,
>
> Mark Lentczner wrote:
> > http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
>
> What's periodic about it?
We hope it will be periodically updated. :)
> Otherwise, _nice_ table.
indee.d
Mark Lentczner wrote:
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current design
of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators - well
over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a few
months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.ozoneho
Hello,
Mark Lentczner wrote:
> http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
What's periodic about it?
Otherwise, _nice_ table.
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mark Lentczner wrote:
All -
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current design
of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators - well
over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a few
months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.o
Mark Lentczner wrote:
All -
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current design
of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators - well
over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a few
months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.o
> "ML" == Mark Lentczner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ML> http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
very cool!
bugs: <, lt say greater. same in reverse for >, gt
the fonts for the little things in the corners could be a bit larger or
clearer.
s/anonamizer/anonymizer/
LOL! That's fantastic! We _must_ put it on dev.perl.org.
Thank you. You are welcome to put it on dev.perl.org.
I can't help myself but to correct it, though :-)
Please do. It was clear that many discussions happened after the TAKE
6 list, my primary reference. I will be happy to update it in
Luke Palmer writes:
> Mark Lentczner writes:
> > All -
> >
> > Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current
> > design of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators -
> > well over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a
> > few months
Mark Lentczner writes:
> All -
>
> Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current
> design of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators -
> well over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a
> few months to get around to drawing it...
>
All -
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current
design of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators -
well over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a
few months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark
38 matches
Mail list logo
