In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Smylers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> brian d foy writes:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:28:48AM -0800, brian d foy wrote:
> > >
> > > : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wal
This is another great example of why I love this list. :o]
I live in GA, so far out in the boonies that I can't get cable or
broadband at *all* except for by satellite. I've stopped trying to
explain what I do, because I start saying things like this, and they
glaze and visibly regret it, lol
brian d foy writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:28:48AM -0800, brian d foy wrote:
> >
> > : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
> > : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :
> > : > : Later in the "Literals" section
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:28:48AM -0800, brian d foy wrote:
> : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
> : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :
> : > : Later in the "Literals" section of S02, there's a chart of the
> : > : cor
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 07:39:16AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:01:06PM -0600, David Green wrote:
> > What happened to the suggestion of using ` to designate units?
>
> It's kinda caught between two other notions. On the one hand,
> we're trying to reserve ` for user defi
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:28:48AM -0800, brian d foy wrote:
: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > : Later in the "Literals" section of S02, there's a chart of the
: > : corresponding forms for fat arrow, pair, and paren notation. It has
: > :
: > :a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Later in the "Literals" section of S02, there's a chart of the
> : corresponding forms for fat arrow, pair, and paren notation. It has
> :
> :a => 'foo' :a :a()
> :
> : That looks like it might mean that thes
On 4 Dec 2007, at 16:19, Andy Armstrong wrote:
my $amp = '&'; # No unit, plain text
my $body = "$amp"html; # gets &
Per http://search.cpan.org/~andya/String-Smart/ I should say.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 4 Dec 2007, at 15:39, Larry Wall wrote:
It's kinda caught between two other notions. On the one hand,
we're trying to reserve ` for user definition, in part because it's
so difficult to tell from ' in many fonts so we're avoiding it for
standard usage. On the other hand, it's not clear that
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:01:06PM -0600, David Green wrote:
> On 10/6/07, brian d foy wrote:
>> That looks like it might mean that these are corresponding forms:
>>8 => 377:8<377>:8(377)
>>
>> Now, if I can do that, what happens to the pair form in a hash composer
>> when I want the ke
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:00:18PM -0500, brian d foy wrote:
: This is basically the same question I had about file test operators
: earlier
: (http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language/2007/04/msg27415.htm
: l). I never got an answer on my syntax question and the discussion went
: off to
On 10/6/07, brian d foy wrote:
That looks like it might mean that these are corresponding forms:
8 => 377:8<377>:8(377)
Now, if I can do that, what happens to the pair form in a hash composer
when I want the key of '8' and the value of :10<377>?
What happened to the suggestion of us
This is basically the same question I had about file test operators
earlier
(http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language/2007/04/msg27415.htm
l). I never got an answer on my syntax question and the discussion went
off to talk about file tests instead of pair notation.
>From S02 "The genera
13 matches
Mail list logo
