On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 11:25:43PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
: Apologies if I'm Mr Magoo, but I did a bit of a search on this just now, and
: uncovered little more than a pithy quote from Piers Cawley in:
:
: http://dev.perl.org/perl6/list-summaries/2005/p6summary.2005-07-05.html
:
: asserting
On 12/24/05, Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious to know if the Perl 6 design team fully endorse a change from the
> Perl 5 "the (single) implementation *is* the specification" model to a
> "multiple implementations are good, m'kay, but from a single (detailed and
> precise) spec
Apologies if I'm Mr Magoo, but I did a bit of a search on this just now, and
uncovered little more than a pithy quote from Piers Cawley in:
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/list-summaries/2005/p6summary.2005-07-05.html
asserting that "Multiple implementations are good, m'kay".
If anyone can point me to
