Re: Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-09 Thread Joe Gottman
- Original Message - From: "Larry Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 10:39 PM Subject: Re: Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection) > Oh, I accidentally left NEXT out of my canonical list.

Re: Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-08 Thread Larry Wall
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:57:04PM +, Dave Mitchell wrote: : On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:39:44PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: : > my @x will begin {...} # at BEGIN time : > my @x will check {...} # at CHECK time (redefined to unit check) : > my @x will init {...} # at INI

Re: Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-08 Thread Dave Mitchell
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:39:44PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > my @x will begin {...} # at BEGIN time > my @x will check {...} # at CHECK time (redefined to unit check) > my @x will init {...} # at INIT time > my @x will end {...}# at END time Sorry, perhaps

Re: Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-06 Thread Larry Wall
Oh, I accidentally left NEXT out of my canonical list. We do need to have the equivalent to Perl 5's "continue". Larry

Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-06 Thread Larry Wall
Okay you guys, you're running away from one kind of madness and proposing various other kinds of madness in its place. Mostly you're confusing what should be easy and what should be possible. First a note about cleanup dependencies. In general, these should be driven by the structure of the data