Perhaps these help?
http://pugs.blogs.com/pugs/2005/02/day_28_609.html
https://www.google.com/#q=site:http%3A%2F%2Fpugs.blogs.com%2F+licensing
--
raiph
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 11/05/2013 03:16 PM, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3
frettled,
Right, it's just the AL2 requires you to thoroughly rename the project's
main name(s) if you redistribute a modified version..
-Matthew
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> I have no idea if the AL2 is well
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:00:59AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > Forking the documentation, or creating derivative works, shouldn't be a
> > problem, as long as it doesn't change the specification in itself, and
> > thereby create confusion regarding what the Perl 6 specification is.
>
> ..
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> Considering that the specification is sortof actually a language
> specification, I think there should at least be some terms regarding how
> this should apply.
Just to nit semantics a bit and push a little harder on something I've
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Somehow I have always worked under the assumption that it is under
> the Artistic License 2, just as Rakudo and NQP, and community
> concensus seem to agree with me. Therefor I've added an AL2 LICENSE
> file to the perl6/roast repositor
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> I have no idea if the AL2 is well suited for sets of documents, as the
> specification is. I'll leave that decision to Larry.
>
To anyone in doubt: please note that I'm not Larry, I'm not an authority,
I'm just opinionated. :)
Considering tha
Hi,
On 11/05/2013 03:16 PM, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Kalinni Gorzkis
mailto:musicdenotat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can I distribute and modify the Perl 6 specification documents and
test suite under which conditions? If not, I propose that they
should be di
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Kalinni Gorzkis
wrote:
> Can I distribute and modify the Perl 6 specification documents and test
> suite under which conditions? If not, I propose that they should be
> distributed under the Artistic License 2.0.
>
That is an excellent question.
I've checked the g
Can I distribute and modify the Perl 6 specification documents and test
suite under which conditions? If not, I propose that they should be
distributed under the Artistic License 2.0.
