At 7:25 AM -0700 4/11/02, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Dan> (Or maybe attributed string eval, like:
>
>Dan> $foo = eval.Parrot set I0, 12
>Dan> sub I0, I0, 5
>Dan> EOP
>
>That would make more sense
> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> (Or maybe attributed string eval, like:
Dan> $foo = eval.Parrot sub I0, I0, 5
Dan>EOP
That would make more sense to me (for whatever that's worth) as
$foo = Parrot.eval < http:
great idea :")
I've just tried gnuCash program and think it is very cool (i've enjoyed to take
first steps in double-entry accounting, i was always wondering what the hell is this
:") )...
http://www.ncsysadmin.org/july2001/ncsa-gnucash-talk.html#toc1
(very entertaining intro :") )
Meanw
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 09:23 AM 4/10/2002 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>>Okay, this is the beginnings of Scheme in Perl6. I'm sure there's
>>stuff I'm getting wrong. I've not written the parser yet for instance
>
> Very nice! Quite a sample, maybe Larry/Damian can use this
>
At 09:23 AM 4/10/2002 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Okay, this is the beginnings of Scheme in Perl6. I'm sure there's
>stuff I'm getting wrong. I've not written the parser yet for instance
Very nice! Quite a sample, maybe Larry/Damian can use this
in one of the next $(A,E)'s
> my SchemeExpr $.v
At 3:49 PM +0100 4/10/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Your idea at the end of regugitating the code back out as Parrot or Perl
>> is just slightly stunning on its own.
>
>I thought that was the easy bit. The compiler just (for appropriate
>values of 'just'
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 10:03, Piers Cawley wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
>> > [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
>>
>> I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you
>> all into silence?
>
> On my clock, you
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 10:03, Piers Cawley wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
> > [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
>
> I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you all
> into silence?
On my clock, your original message arrived at 04:23, and your followu
At 3:03 PM +0100 4/10/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
>> [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
>
>I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you all
>into silence?
Nah. You just can't hear the people running away screaming from there. ;-P
-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
> [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you all
into silence?
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a re
Okay, this is the beginnings of Scheme in Perl6. I'm sure there's
stuff I'm getting wrong. I've not written the parser yet for instance
and I'm toying with waiting for A5 before I do. Also, I've not yet
implemented such important stuff as proper closures/lambda or the
environment chain, but the un
11 matches
Mail list logo
