"Jeremy Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
> Hyper-operators (i.e. element-wise array ops) and explicit array threading
> are not incompatible. In fact, I wrote RFC 82 (element-wise array ops)
> and was heavily involved in RFC 207 (Buddha Buck and I wrote most of RFCs
> 202-207 together, but w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > @arr3 = @arr1[^i] + @arr2[^i] # also @arr[^i] = @arr1[^i] +
@arr2[^i]
> >
> > Hyper-operators do this just fine.
> >
> Oh yes they do. The point is that the ^i-loop way is better (more powerful
and simpler at the same time).
>
> Maybe the examples where not good en
>
> > @arr3 = @arr1[^i] + @arr2[^i] # also @arr[^i] = @arr1[^i] + @arr2[^i]
>
> Hyper-operators do this just fine.
>
Oh yes they do. The point is that the ^i-loop way is better (more powerful and simpler
at the same time).
Maybe the examples where not good enough.
Take the @b ^/ $a expressi
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:06:15PM +0200, Angel Faus wrote:
>
> Maybe i should better explain myself with an example.
>
> @arr3 = @arr1[^i] + @arr2[^i] # also @arr[^i] = @arr1[^i] + @arr2[^i]
Hyper-operators do this just fine.
> @arr4 = $v * @arr1[^i]
> $sum =+ @arr1[^i]
> @lengths_array =
Hi to all,
I have been thinking lately about hyperoperators, and particulary
about its similarity with RFC 207 (Arrays: Efficient Array Loops)
For the ones that don't have the RFC in mind, I copy its abstract:
>This RFC proposes a notation for creating efficient implicit
>loops over mul
