What's really odd is that document links to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_disjunction which ends up
stating that chained xors are associative and commutative, meaning
that instead of acting as one(), it counts parity.
Rob
On 5/9/05, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Wo
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
"Juerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You both use "iff". What does that mean?
I believe it's to be read "if and only if".
Yes, but that doesn't explain what it means. Rather than me try to
explain it (poorly)...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if
David
"Juerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You both use "iff". What does that mean?
I believe it's to be read "if and only if".
Jonathan
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 02:04:45AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Juerd skribis 2005-05-07 1:23 (+0200):
: > Perl 5's perlop says: "It cannot short circuit, of course." Can
: > someone explain why it cannot?
:
: I was confused. It is entirely obvious why it can't.
On the other hand, one(...) semantics ca
Juerd skribis 2005-05-07 1:23 (+0200):
> Perl 5's perlop says: "It cannot short circuit, of course." Can
> someone explain why it cannot?
I was confused. It is entirely obvious why it can't.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http:/
Trewth Seeker wrote:
> Mark A. Biggar wrote:
> > Trewth Seeker wrote:
> > > In this case, we are dealing with '^^', a meaningless
> > > unpronounceable symbol.
Caret caret.
> > > Oh, but wait ... we also spell it 'xor',
When reading code, it's probably read as xor, but when discussing syntax
it
Here's the same message, with less annoying word wrapping. (Especially
useful for mailers that show different levels of quotes in different
colours.)
Trewth Seeker wrote:
> Mark A. Biggar wrote:
> > Trewth Seeker wrote:
> > > I see here another case of a common erroneous approach to
> > > problem
Oops, this should have been redirected to perl6-language@perl.org, so
I'm doing that now.
--- Trewth Seeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 13:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Trewth Seeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Pugs 6.2.0 released.
> To: "Mark A. Biggar" <[EMAIL PROTECT
