Re: Definitive and Complete Perl 6 Operator List

2005-04-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Larry" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Larry> The shifts are all X< rather than X<< to avoid confusion with Texas Quotes. I've been staring too much at POD lately. I saw both of those as very broken pod-start marks. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, I

Re: Definitive and Complete Perl 6 Operator List

2005-04-02 Thread Larry Wall
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:49:24AM -0800, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote: : I've included assignment forms of all operators in the exponentiation, : multiplicative, additive, junctive, and tight logical levels; this may : be overkill or underkill. I've not included hyper forms of these : operators,

Re: Definitive and Complete Perl 6 Operator List

2005-04-02 Thread Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Savige said: > > Is there a definitive, official, complete list of all Perl 6 operators, > > along with their precedence levels? > > Well, Synopsis 3 is the list you're looking for, but it's clearly not > all there. Take the table there to be your d

Re: Definitive and Complete Perl 6 Operator List

2005-04-02 Thread Luke Palmer
Andrew Savige said: > Is there a definitive, official, complete list of all Perl 6 operators, > along with their precedence levels? I believe that Kurt Gödel, in a corollary to his famous theorem, also showed that "Any Perl 6 list is either indefinitive or incomplete". Well, Synopsis 3 is the lis

Definitive and Complete Perl 6 Operator List

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Savige
S03 does not seem to detail a complete list of all Perl 6 operators. For example, it explicitly mentions += but does not mention -= Googling around, I found the Perl 6 Periodic Table of Operators http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html (which I assume does not form part of the