On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:46:39PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
: Prototyping in P6 would seem to me to be easy, but not quite the
: default. You'd want an intermediary that did the MetaClass negotiation
: as you "derived" from an existing object. Or will that be in the core?
: Can you say:
:
:
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 12:18, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:44:24AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> : For that they leave it to lambda.weblogs.com to heap *educated* scorn
> : and derision on things. :)
>
> Hmm, well, in all their educatedness, they don't seem to have figured
> out t
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 01:19:36PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
: On 4/19/04 11:11 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:12:58PM -0400, Austin Hastings wrote:
: > : If it's not totally obvious to everyone, you should download a copy of A12
: > : (I like the "printer-friendly" all-in-o
On 4/19/04 11:11 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:12:58PM -0400, Austin Hastings wrote:
> : If it's not totally obvious to everyone, you should download a copy of A12
> : (I like the "printer-friendly" all-in-one-page version) as a hedge against
> : the almost-inevitable slashdott
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:44:24AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
: For that they leave it to lambda.weblogs.com to heap *educated* scorn
: and derision on things. :)
Hmm, well, in all their educatedness, they don't seem to have figured
out that the prototyping behavior they're looking for is actuall
> No, obviously arguments. Okay, I see the problem. What you're missing
> is that in an earlier Apocalypse, we said that postfix subscripts
> and argument lists may not have an intervening space.
Oh, I see. Yes, I had missed that. Thanks for clearing that up.
--Abhijit
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:37:57AM -0500, Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote:
: > $obj.meth, -> obviously not arguments
: > $obj.meth $foo,$bar -> obviously arguments
: >
:
: $obj.meth() + $bat -> obviosly not arguments
: $obj.meth () + $bat
At 8:11 AM -0700 4/19/04, Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:12:58PM -0400, Austin Hastings wrote:
: If it's not totally obvious to everyone, you should download a copy of A12
: (I like the "printer-friendly" all-in-one-page version) as a hedge against
: the almost-inevitable slashdotting
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote:
> : $obj.method ($x + $y) + $z
> :
> : >From the earlier examples (like $obj.method +1), I got the impression that
> : you look ahead until you find a term or an operator. In the example a
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:12:58PM -0400, Austin Hastings wrote:
: If it's not totally obvious to everyone, you should download a copy of A12
: (I like the "printer-friendly" all-in-one-page version) as a hedge against
: the almost-inevitable slashdotting.
Or not...
Perhaps slashdot has decided t
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote:
: I do not understand one of the examples in the Use of methods/the dot
: notation section:
:
: $obj.method ($x + $y) + $z
:
: >From the earlier examples (like $obj.method +1), I got the impression that
: you look ahead until you
I do not understand one of the examples in the Use of methods/the dot
notation section:
$obj.method ($x + $y) + $z
>From the earlier examples (like $obj.method +1), I got the impression that
you look ahead until you find a term or an operator. In the example above,
isn't ($x + $y) a full term, al
If it's not totally obvious to everyone, you should download a copy of A12
(I like the "printer-friendly" all-in-one-page version) as a hedge against
the almost-inevitable slashdotting.
13 matches
Mail list logo
