On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:56:59AM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: What if instead, we add a different adverb to q// and qq//? something
: like :h. That way people can mix and match all the quoting option they
: want, and we remove some annoying requirements about when you can and
: cannot have /<<\s+
Rod Adams skribis 2004-11-29 1:56 (-0600):
> Are they really common enough to merit a "two char, absolutely no
> whitespace after it" lexical? Especially one that looks a lot like the
> left bitshift operator, as well as an ASCII version of a Unicode quoting
> and splitting character?
> What if
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:32:58AM +0300, Alexey Trofimenko wrote:
I notice that in Perl6 thoose funny « and » could be much more common
than other paired brackets. And some people likes how they look, but
nobody likes fact that there's no (and won't!) be a consistent way to type
them in diff
