Rob Kinyon wrote:
>On 5/15/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Rob Kinyon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be very feasible to do this natively in
>>>P5. But, would it be possible to do it natively in P6? As in,
>>>supported within the interpreter vs. through some sor
On 5/15/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Kinyon wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be very feasible to do this natively in
> P5. But, would it be possible to do it natively in P6? As in,
> supported within the interpreter vs. through some sort of overloading.
Look at "is atomic"
Rob Kinyon wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be very feasible to do this natively in
> P5. But, would it be possible to do it natively in P6? As in,
> supported within the interpreter vs. through some sort of overloading.
Look at "is atomic" in S17draft, and Software Transaction Memory in gener
I've been working on DBM::Deep, a way to have P5's data structures
stored on disk instead of RAM. One of the major features I've been
adding has been ACID transactions.
I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be very feasible to do this natively in
P5. But, would it be possible to do it natively in P6? As in
