On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Aldo Calpini wrote:
: but: what if Animal does inherits from something else? what I would like
: to do (what I was trying to do with wrappers, that is) is to call the
: inherited constructor, then do something with the returned object.
: something like:
:
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 19:01, Larry Wall wrote:
> That would almost certainly fail with an error saying that it couldn't
> find your &new subroutine. The & sigil does not imply dispatch, and
> the default .new is inherited, not autogenerated, last I checked. :-)
ouch. too true.
so I guess my Ani
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:00:27PM +0200, Aldo Calpini wrote:
: role Logging {
: POST {
: foreach ( ::_.meta.getmethods() ) -> $method {
: $method.wrap( {
: log($somewhere, "calling $method");
: call;
:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Aldo Calpini wrote:
: class Animal {
: our @.zoo;
: &new.wrap( {
: my @results = call();
: push(@.zoo, @results[0]);
: return @results;
: } );
: }
That would almost certainly fail with an
> > role Logging {
> > POST {
> > foreach ( ::_.meta.getmethods() ) -> $method {
> > $method.wrap( {
> > log($somewhere, "calling $method");
> > call;
> > log($somewhere, "called $method");
> >
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Aldo Calpini wrote:
> so I wanted to explore the possible interoperability of wrappers and
> classes. another example I can think of:
> role Logging {
> POST {
> foreach ( ::_.meta.getmethods() ) -> $method {
> $method.wrap( {
>
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Aldo Calpini wrote:
> let's suppose I want to build a class that keeps track of the objects it
> creates.
>
> let's suppose that I want this class to be the base for a variety of
> classes.
>
> let's suppose that I decide, rather than fiddling with the default
> constructor, t
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 16:59, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
> Perl6 seems already to have plenty of mechanisms like delegation
> to dynamically change the behavior of a class. So, probably,
> wrappers is a mechanism more adapted to extend method behavior at
> run-time by entities that don't have access to
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Aldo Calpini wrote:
> let's suppose I want to build a class that keeps track of the objects it
> creates.
>
> let's suppose that I want this class to be the base for a variety of
> classes.
>
> let's suppose that I decide, rather than fiddling with the
let's suppose I want to build a class that keeps track of the objects it
creates.
let's suppose that I want this class to be the base for a variety of
classes.
let's suppose that I decide, rather than fiddling with the default
constructor, to wrap it up.
something like:
class Animal {
10 matches
Mail list logo
