On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2008-12-22 às 15:06 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Overmeer wrote:
For ???B. In the current set-up, you use CPAN.pm to download, and then
install. The 'cpan' script is a wrapper around CPAN.pm. CPAN.pm starts
the
Em Seg, 2008-12-22 às 15:06 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Overmeer wrote:
> > For ???B. In the current set-up, you use CPAN.pm to download, and then
> > install. The 'cpan' script is a wrapper around CPAN.pm. CPAN.pm starts
> > the install tool. A more convient
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Overmeer wrote:
* Timothy S. Nelson (wayl...@wayland.id.au) [081220 03:45]:
Btw, looks like I was wrong about the terminology of
CPAN6/6PAN/whatever. See link below for details (the new Terminology
section).
http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-pa
* Timothy S. Nelson (wayl...@wayland.id.au) [081220 03:45]:
> Btw, looks like I was wrong about the terminology of
> CPAN6/6PAN/whatever. See link below for details (the new Terminology
> section).
>
> http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-package-format.pod
I do not understan
Btw, looks like I was wrong about the terminology of
CPAN6/6PAN/whatever. See link below for details (the new Terminology
section).
http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-package-format.pod
:)
-
| Name: T
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Are there any objections if I refactor the current S22 into 3 parts,
and retain the .jib files stuff in the current S22 (renamed to
S22-package-format.pod), a document containing "what S22 said about CPAN6"
(which we could then donate to the cpan6
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package
format (layout, metadata, etc), and
Mark, am I right in putting it like this?
6PAN:
- Perl6 package format
- Client-side part of "CPAN"
CPAN6:
- Server-side part of "CPAN" (with more stuff)
Is that how you see it?
:)
-
* jerry gay (jerry@gmail.com) [081218 14:01]:
> > If you understand my explanation of CPAN6, then you certainly must be
> > ware that 6PAN and CPAN6 have nothing to do with each other. Please do
> > not use them in combination. It is as silly as saying TCP/Linux
> there's a difference? that
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:45, Mark Overmeer wrote:
> * Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]:
>> Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
>> > My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
>> > version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it wi
* Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]:
> Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> > My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
> > version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN
> > Package
> > format (layout
Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
> version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package
> format (layout, metadata, etc), and I'd suggest that it also include the
>
My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package
format (layout, metadata, etc), and I'd suggest that it also include the
layout of packages on the 6PAN server.
Some have suggested a particular
13 matches
Mail list logo
