HaloO,
Juerd wrote:
Can you explain please what "outside-in" means to you?
TSa wrote:
BTW, does everybody expect more than one prefix numerifyer beeing
redundant or is there an idea of (+ (+ @foo)) beeing modelled
Juerd answered:
It's providing context to something that was already providi
Hi,
please configure your e-mail client to use "> " (greater-than, space)
for quoting, if possible. It currently uses ">" (greater-than).
TSa skribis 2005-09-26 13:43 (+0200):
> >>Why not define .chars like this:
> >> Context Return value
> >> itemamount of units
> >> list
HaloO,
Juerd wrote:
wolverian skribis 2005-09-24 13:45 (+0300):
Why not define .chars like this:
Context Return value
itemamount of units
listunits themselves
I still have my objections to this outside-in flow of type
information.
Originally I thought that .el
wolverian skribis 2005-09-24 13:45 (+0300):
> Why not define .chars like this:
> Context Return value
> itemamount of units
> listunits themselves
Agreed, of course.
> Originally I thought that .elems and .chars were symmetric and both
> should behave the same sema
Hi all,
After some thinking it occured to me that the current way of defining
.chars, .bytes and .elems (and whatever else there are) doesn't make any
sense to me. In pugs at least they currently return the amount of units
in question - in any context! Why not define .chars like this:
Context
