At 4:26 PM -0700 9/15/06, Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: As I recall, we're allowed to put absolutely any characters we want
: in an identifier if it is a delimited identifier rather than a
: bareword identifier.
I have no clue what you mean by
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: As I recall, we're allowed to put absolutely any characters we want
: in an identifier if it is a delimited identifier rather than a
: bareword identifier.
I have no clue what you mean by 'delimited identifier'. Are you referring
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2006-09-15 16:50 (-0500):
> > > To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> > > postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> > > and the like. (And also giving us a general way of isolating the
> > > method name from the .*
At 4:55 PM -0500 9/15/06, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
So, we discussed making -e a real method, which would imply that
> identifiers can begin with -.
As a bit of a tangent, occasionally I wish that we could use - in
identifiers instead o
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> So, we discussed making -e a real method, which would imply that
> identifiers can begin with -.
As a bit of a tangent, occasionally I wish that we could use - in
identifiers instead of _. I'd rather type $some-long-name than
$some_long_na
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:28:18PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-15 14:03 (-0700):
> > To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> > postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> > and the like. (And also giving us a general way of is
Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-15 14:03 (-0700):
> To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> and the like. (And also giving us a general way of isolating the
> method name from the .* variants, not to mention
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: 1. Get rid of it entirely. Normal methods and/or "use Shell" fill the gap.
: 2. Install it as a prefix op, not as a postfix op. To get to $_, write
:-e $_ explicitly.
: 3. Install these as prefix ops, and as postfix ops, but not as a gene
Aaron Sherman skribis 2006-09-15 15:28 (-0400):
> I didn't see this going back, sorry if I missed someone sending the mail.
Sorry. I promised to do it, but have so far lacked tuits and more or
less forgot all about it. Thanks for bringing it up!
> There was a discussion on IRC on Sept 9th about t
I didn't see this going back, sorry if I missed someone sending the mail.
There was a discussion on IRC on Sept 9th about the -X filetest
operators between at least audreyt, Juerd, myself and markstos. The
problem with these operators was that they conflicted in some cases with
the parsing of
10 matches
Mail list logo
