HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
...I think that should work. The *-1 value just means "one before
Whatever", and the dwim is, as you say, lazy. Or perhaps this generalizes
to an odd form of currying:
&replicate := * xx 42;
Ohh, let me get that in my own words: the rhs replicates a Whatever
int
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:29:03PM +0100, TSa wrote:
: HaloO,
:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: >+Alternately, C<*+0> is the first element, and the subscript dwims
: >+from the front or back depending on the sign. That would be more
: >+symmetrical, but makes the idea of C<*> in a subscript a little
HaloO,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+Alternately, C<*+0> is the first element, and the subscript dwims
+from the front or back depending on the sign. That would be more
+symmetrical, but makes the idea of C<*> in a subscript a little more
+distant from the notion of "all the keys", which would be a
Author: larry
Date: Tue Jan 30 12:20:47 2007
New Revision: 13550
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Log:
Another idea for *+ vs *- in subscripts
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/
