Arguably I've got the dwimminess backwards on this. It seems like
%outer «+=» %inner
ought to dwim that I want the union of keys. In that view the standard
non-dwimmy behavior is to ignore keys that are not in the other hash,
and dwimmery consists of using keys even if they aren't in the ot
Author: larry
Date: Mon Oct 30 12:18:19 2006
New Revision: 13350
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
1st whack at applying dwimmy hypers to hashes.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/desi
