On 22/08/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Output?
>
> sub foo (+$a, *%overflow) {
> say "%overflow{}";
> }
>
> foo(:a(1), :b(2)); # b2
> foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b => 2 }); # b
Hi,
Luke Palmer wrote:
> sub foo (+$a, *%overflow) {
> say "%overflow{}";
> }
>
> foo(:a(1), :b(2)); # b 2
> foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b => 2 }); # b2
I'd think so, too.
> foo(:a(1), :ov
Output?
sub foo (+$a, *%overflow) {
say "%overflow{}";
}
foo(:a(1), :b(2)); # b2
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b => 2 }); # b2
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b => 2 }, :c(3)); # ???
Luke
I also don't expect
$x = '';
$y = " $x ";
to assign '' to $y either, but that's the equlvalent of what you say
form() will do.
I see your point.
I was more worried about arrays of items some of which are empty strings
and having items disappear out my repost because form() throws them
aw
Damian Conway wrote:
But that means I have to pre-process data lists that just happen to
contain empty strings so that they won't disappear on me.
Huh? An empty string already *has* disappeared on you. ;-)
> This seems to violate least surprise.
I'd be much more surprised if an empty string *
But that means I have to pre-process data lists that just happen to
contain empty strings so that they won't disappear on me.
Huh? An empty string already *has* disappeared on you. ;-)
> This seems to violate least surprise.
I'd be much more surprised if an empty string *didn't* disappear.
After
Damian Conway wrote:
Mark A. Biggar wrote:
What if I want to interpolate an empty string and let the fill
characters work?
Then you interpolate a single fill character instead of the empty string.
But that means I have to pre-process data lists that just happen to
contain empty strings so that
Mark A. Biggar wrote:
What if I want to interpolate an empty string and let the fill
characters work?
Then you interpolate a single fill character instead of the empty string.
Damian
Damian Conway wrote:
Mark A. Biggar wrote:
Expect wouldn't that produce a extra blank line if $text is short?
Nope. Formats only generate text lines if at least one of their fields
interpolates at least one character.
Damian
What if I want to interpolate an empty string and let the fill
char
Mark A. Biggar wrote:
Expect wouldn't that produce a extra blank line if $text is short?
Nope. Formats only generate text lines if at least one of their fields
interpolates at least one character.
Damian
Luke Palmer wrote:
Arn't there cases where the overflow field want to be bigger then the
first field? Something the ends up looking like:
LABEL: texttexttextexttexttext
texttextexttextetexttexttextte
xttexttexttexttexttexttextttex
where LABEL is in one field and text... is in an oveflow
Luke Palmer wrote:
Mark A. Biggar writes:
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:59:15AM -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
: Smylers --
:
: So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
: above". In the example, the column range for the overflow fie
Mark A. Biggar writes:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:59:15AM -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> >: Smylers --
> >:
> >: So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
> >: above". In the example, the
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:59:15AM -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
: Smylers --
:
: So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
: above". In the example, the column range for the overflow field is
: exactly the same as that of the $meth
Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
above". In the example, the column range for the overflow field is
exactly the same as that of the $method field in the prior "picture".
But, what does it do if it doesn't m
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:59:15AM -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
: Smylers --
:
: So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
: above". In the example, the column range for the overflow field is
: exactly the same as that of the $method field in the
Smylers --
So, what I'm looking for is more explicit phrasing around "immediately
above". In the example, the column range for the overflow field is
exactly the same as that of the $method field in the prior "picture".
But, what does it do if it doesn't match *exa
Gregor N. Purdy writes:
> In "And now at length they overflow their banks." its not clear
> how an overflow field gets tied to its initial non-overflow field.
> In the recipe example given, how does it know to go with the
> $method field instead of the $prep_time field?
T
In "And now at length they overflow their banks." its not clear
how an overflow field gets tied to its initial non-overflow field.
In the recipe example given, how does it know to go with the
$method field instead of the $prep_time field? Is it basing off
of matching the horizontal ext
19 matches
Mail list logo
