Buddha Buck wrote:
Examples:
# process @array, one element at a time
for @array -> $x { ... };
Yes.
# process @array, in pairs
for @array -> $x, $y { ... };
Yes.
# process all of @a, then all of @b, one element at a time
for @a, @b -> $x { ... };
Yes.
# process @a, then @b, in pai
Here's my current understanding of what's under discussion for for-loops:
Larry wants to eliminate the ; from the RHS of the ->, so the only thing
for needs to know about the RHS is the number and types of the
arguments. This puts the specification about how to generate those
arguments on the
