Re: Turning Japanese (was Re: It's Funny. Laugh.)

2001-02-18 Thread yaphet jones
subarashii! < eigo no kotoba = "wonderful!" > >"Coding in Ruby" to the tune of "Turning Japanese" by The Vapors > with endless apologies to everyone involved. creativity! at last! actually, i'm all smiles (^_^) >I've got your tarball, I've got your tarball >I'm milling over installing it myse

Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope

2001-02-18 Thread yaphet jones
gentlemen - gomen nasai! you have my sincere apologies for staying on p6-language so long. i've went and woke david g. up, whose prescription has *obviously* run out. kindly let me know when he's gone back to sleep. (-_-) zzz ja ne! -- yaphet ...python? ...win32? ...really? --

Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope

2001-02-17 Thread yaphet jones
>Feeding the troll: careful with the troll talk: remember, your god's favorite book is the "lord of the rings"...chock full of trolls...and hobbits, too! >> => example 2: ruby >> => now more popular than python in its native japan > >Python isn't native to Japan. obviously, nitwit...ruby is th

Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope

2001-02-17 Thread yaphet jones
>Johan Vromans wrote: >> >> If a Perl construct does not suffer from a slight change that makes >> it easier to accept by new programmers, I think such changes should >> be seriously considered. > >Yes; but the world if full of language [sorry, couldn't resist] >which is optimized (or at least m

Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope

2001-02-17 Thread yaphet jones
>On Sat, Feb 17 2001 09:04:54 -0800, Simon Cozens wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:02:08AM -0800, yaphet jones wrote: >> the tchrist (christiansen) said it best, when he described perl5: >>...an "expert-friendly" language... > >And he was right. P

Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope

2001-02-17 Thread yaphet jones
>Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>As someone else said before me, Perl should not be changed >>Just Because We Can. Aspects which have proven usefulness and >>are deeply engrained in the Perl mindset should not be tampered >>with just be

Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/

2001-02-12 Thread yaphet jones
i think Matz will agree with me... (consider telling dave thomas and andy hunt, too...) "a language author does not a god make" -- a proverb from the days of cobol > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:11:19AM -0800, yaphet jones wrote: > [Ruby] >> *no god complex >> *

Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/

2001-02-12 Thread yaphet jones
gentlemen (a small liberty, i admit) - all of this *pointless* debate could be set aside - if all of you would just renounce perl - and adopt ruby as your language it's why larry has shut himself up in silence - feigning illness: *true (not bolted-on) oo language *modern (not post-mod