On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:41:08 +0100, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Dom, 2010-05-16 às 19:34 +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com escreveu:
Interoperability with Perl 5 and
is reference counting should not be a high priority in the decision
making
process for defining the Perl 6 concurrency model.
I
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:39:04 +0100, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
This is the point I was trying to address, actually. Having *only*
explicitly shared variables makes it very cumbersome to write threaded
code, specially because explicitly shared variables have a lot of
restrictions on what they can be (t
--- Forwarded message ---
From: nigelsande...@btconnect.com
To: "Dave Whipp - d...@whipp.name"
<+nntp+browseruk+e66dbbe0cf.dave#whipp.n...@spamgourmet.com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: Parallelism and Concurrency was Re: Ideas for
a"Object-Belongs-to-Thread" (nntp: message 4 of 20) threading mo
--- Forwarded message ---
From: nigelsande...@btconnect.com
To: "Dave Whipp - dave_wh...@yahoo.com"
<+nntp+browseruk+2dcf7cf254.dave_whipp#yahoo@spamgourmet.com>, "Dave
Whipp - d...@whipp.name"
<+nntp+browseruk+e66dbbe0cf.dave#whipp.n...@spamgourmet.com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: Paral
On Mon, 17 May 2010 17:20:28 +0100, Dave Whipp - d...@dave.whipp.name
<+nntp+browseruk+a2ac8a2dcb.dpuu#dave.whipp.n...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote:
There are very few algorithms that actually benefit from using even low
hundreds of threads, let alone thousands.
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:35:20 +0100, B. Estrade - estr...@gmail.com
<+nntp+browseruk+c4c81fb0fa.estrabd#gmail@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
The future is indeed multicore - or, rather, *many-core. What this
means is that however the hardware jockeys have to strap them together
on a single node, w
On Fri, 14 May 2010 20:00:01 +0100, Daniel Ruoso - dan...@ruoso.com
<+nntp+browseruk+d52dbf78bb.daniel#ruoso@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 18:13 +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com escreveu:
The point I(we)'ve been trying to make is that once you have a reentrant
interprete
On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:58:00 +0100, Daniel Ruoso - dan...@ruoso.com
<+nntp+browseruk+d52dbf78bb.daniel#ruoso@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 15:48 +0400, Richard Hainsworth escreveu:
The less, or rather the more abstract, the specification in perl6, the
less likely perl6 wil
On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:05:44 +0100, B. Estrade wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:27:18PM +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com
wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:01:41 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol -
rv...@isolution.nl
<+nntp+browseruk+014f2ed3f9.rvtol#isolution...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
>
>The suppo
On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:01:41 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol - rv...@isolution.nl
<+nntp+browseruk+014f2ed3f9.rvtol#isolution...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
The support of threading should be completely optional. The threading
support should not be active by default.
I'd like to understand why you
This should be a reply to Daniel Ruoso's post above, but I cannot persuade
my nntp reader
to reply to a post made before I subscribed here. Sorry
On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:16:35 +0100, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I have 3 main problems with your thinking.
1: You are conflating two fundamentally differe
11 matches
Mail list logo
