Ovid wrote:
Larry pointed out that this topic is better suited
for perl6-language instead of perl6-users, so I'm
forwarding this along.
Is there a reason perl6-users isn't fed through to nntp.perl.org ?
Maybe it is but I don't know to which group?
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 2:17 AM +0200 5/7/06, mAsterdam wrote:
I hope (and think) you are right about that regarding
implementing relations. Using them correctly is another
story though. I don't think Date, Darwen & Lorentzos
lightly took the step of introducing 6NF in 2003.
Aside,
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 12:45 AM +0200 5/7/06, mAsterdam wrote:
Okay, thank you both for clarifying this.
Conceptually in my mind, a Range is entirely appropriate to represent
a mathematical interval, but I was mistaken about Range being more
constrained than it actually is.
So, there you
s
false is a
bug, not a feature.
Okay, thank you both for clarifying this.
Conceptually in my mind, a Range is entirely appropriate to represent a
mathematical interval, but I was mistaken about Range being more
constrained than it actually is.
So, there you go mAsterdam; Range is indeed t
Darren Duncan wrote:
mAsterdam wrote:
Prompted by Darren Duncan's proposal on Relation type objects
I looked at http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S06.html
and wondered how Interval type objects would fit in.
I couldn't imagine how. Now that isn't a surprise
(not for lack
Prompted by Darren Duncan's proposal on Relation type objects
I looked at http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S06.html
and wondered how Interval type objects would fit in.
I couldn't imagine how. Now that isn't a surprise
(not for lack of imagination but for lack of perl6 knowledge).
I tried
