On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> > On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote:
> >> Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8
> >>
> http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8
> >
> > It was nicer when
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
>Hi. I'm wondering if any thought has been given to natural language
> processing with Perl 6 grammars.
>
No specific tool is best suited for natural language processing. There was
apparently a time in which everyone thought that a
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, wrote:
> Author: masak
> Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
> New Revision: 31043
>
> Modified:
> docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
> Log:
> [S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
>
> -class Buf does Positional {...}
> +cl
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:59 AM, wrote:
> This should be a reply to Daniel Ruoso's post above, but I cannot persuade
> my nntp reader
> to reply to a post made before I subscribed here. Sorry
>
> And at the core of that, is the need for preemptive (kernel) threading and
> shared memory.
>
> These
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Though even clearer and same number of characters as whole_seconds is:
>
> $dt.seconds.round
This makes more sense to me than the first example you listed because when
dealing with time measurement, I rarely think of seconds that ar
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> You're using it wrong. You need to put 'trusts B;' in A in order for B to
> > see A's privates. I hope it is obvious why this is the case. -- Darren
> > Duncan
>
> Aye, my mistake. Apparently the syntax I used to try to get at the
> private a
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Timothy S. Nelson
wrote:
> There's a school of thought, common among printing/publishing types, that
>> insists that underline was intended solely to replace italics when they
>> couldn't be represented (i.e. no fonts, as with ASCII terminals and
>> printers). Th
t.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/day-1-getting-rakudo/
Sorry about that empty reply.
-Jason Switzer
I was reading over S19 and had a few questions.
1) The colon delimiter (":name") is specified but no options are declared to
use it specifically. It's not clear why we would need this delimiter on top
of the other more popular delimiters. Are the long form (double dash), meta
syntax form (double p
Since I don't know anything about nuclear power plants, I think the BikeShed
should be painted blue and called "Rakudo Whatever" or just "Rakudo".
-Jason "s1n" Switzer
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=jason switzer;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:jswit...@gmail.com
CLASS:PRIVATE
CREATED:20090605T035151Z
DESCRIPTION:Hello All!We are planning on having another
Dallas.p6m meeting soon. We are meeting next week (Tuesday\, June 9th
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=jason switzer;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:jswit...@gmail.com
CLASS:PRIVATE
CREATED:20090605T035151Z
DESCRIPTION:Hello All!We are planning on having another
Dallas.p6m meeting soon. We are meeting next week (Tuesday\, June 9th
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Jon Lang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Daniel Carrera
> wrote:
> > I think we might need to come up with some sort of standard naming
> > convention to distinguish dependencies. Something that the *user* can
> > recognize quickly when he browses CPAN.
>
I want to pose the same question for clarification that I asked #perl6:
S01 says that perl5 code will be supported via "use v5". Can someone confirm
that embedded perl5 code is still required of any valid implementation? If
so, how will XS code be supported? Will the namespace between v5 code and
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:10 PM, James Fuller
wrote:
> Is there any sponsorship money to spend on a very good graphic
> designer to create something based on a small list of requirements as
> to what meaning it should convey ?
>
I would agree; have a professional do it and we'll probably get bett
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 9:47 PM, wrote:
> Added: docs/Perl6/Spec/S28-special-variables.pod
> ===
> +=head2 Named variables (see S02):
> +$?OS # operating system compiled for
> +$*OS # operating system runn
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Dave Whipp wrote:
> A spec-test is (or should be) different from an ad-hoc test. I want to be
> able to say "test S09.237 passes on pugs but not on Rakudo" (perhaps with a
> nicer name). Unique identifiers allow comparisons of specific tests across
> multiple imp
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM, jerry gay wrote:
> $x == $y
>:ok({ .true ?? 'message' !! 'failure message' })
>:diag( 'tap comment', :some_tap_property)
I just want to stress again that I would like to see no focus on just tap
emitters. While I realize this is just an example, adverbs
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> So Larry and Patrick developed the idea of creating an
> adverb on the test operator instead:
>
>$x == 1e5 :ok('the :ok makes this is a test');
>
> This is an adverb on the infix:<==> operator, and might
> desugar to something like this:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jon Lang wrote:
> OK, then. If I'm understanding this correctly, the problem being
> raised has to do with deciding which language features to treat as
> primitives and which ones to bootstrap from those primitives. The
> difficulty is that different compilers p
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Ovid
wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: jason switzer
>
> > If we wanted language dependent version, use :leading, :trailing, and
> :both.
> > That will require each implementation properly handle the language
> >
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:19:12PM -0800, Jon Lang wrote:
> : As well, isn't there a way to escape a character that would otherwise
> : be interpolated? If the intent were as you suppose, the original
> : could be rewritten as:
> :
> : $ per
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:07 AM, jesse wrote:
>
> 'left' and 'right' are probably not the right names for functions which
> trim leading and/or trailing space, since their meanings get somewhat
> ambiguous if a language renders right-to-left instead of left-to-right
> or vice-versa
>
I'm in favo
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> > oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and
> > forgot to address the item here. C replaces p5's
> > C (that's the latest idea from damian, although it seems n
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM, jason switzer wrote:
> > It's lazy and kinda cheating, but for small simple tasks, it gets the job
> > done. I'm not up to speed with the IO spec, but a sort of auto-slurp
> &
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
> a) I am fed up with writing something like
>
> open(FP, ">${fname}_out.txt") or die "Cant open ${fname}_out.txt for
> writing\n";
>
> The complex definition of the filename is only to show that it has to be
> restated identically twice.
It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get what you ask for. It also
makes sense to make to not use magical implied numbers, such as negatives,
to accomplish things that either ranges or whatever star can accomplish.
Just my 2 cents.
-Jason "s1n" Switzer
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:27 AM, M
27 matches
Mail list logo
