Re: PDL-P: Re: RFC 115 (v1) Default methods for objects

2000-08-18 Thread c . soeller
"David L. Nicol" wrote: > > =head1 TITLE > > > > Default methods for objects > > Title does not match description. How about > > Overloadable bracketing > > or > > Brackets as Methods > > or > > Syntax as Overloadable Methods Good point! Will be part of v2. Christian

Re: PDL-P: Re: PDL and perl6

2000-08-05 Thread c . soeller
Tuomas Lukka wrote: > > Do we really need PDL objects in perl 6? How about we investigate building > > compact arrays into the language? We're already talking about how we can add > > typing to the language--I would have thought that if these semantics make it > > in, we could look to optimise ho

Re: PDL-P: Re: PDL and perl6

2000-08-05 Thread c . soeller
Jeremy Howard wrote: > Make sure you read the interesting RFCs from Damian Conway on related > issues: > > > * Built-ins: min() and max() functions and acceptors > > > > * Built-ins: reduce() function Couldn't see these. > > > > * Data structures: Semi-finite (lazy) lists > > > > * Subroutines

PDL and perl6

2000-08-05 Thread c . soeller
I'd thought I try to summarize what has come up so far and see if we can find somebody who can write some RFCs. 1) the XS replacement should provide for a way to publish (C-level) APIs across modules. That would get around the hacks that Tk, PDL, OpenGL, etc have to go through at the moment. Good