Re: Blocks, continuations and eval()

2005-04-22 Thread Stéphane Payrard
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 08:13:58PM +0200, Stéphane Payrard wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:32:55AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > > Thank you for your detailled answer. I still don't get what you mean > by "[] pattern matching arguments". > Do you mean smart pattern matching on composite value

Re: scoping functions as list operators?

2005-02-24 Thread Stéphane Payrard
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:09:24PM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "SP" == Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SP> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:56:06AM +0100, Stéphane Payrard wrote: > >> > >> Giving scoping functions the status of list operators > >> would allow to drop pare

Re: scoping functions as list operators?

2005-02-24 Thread Stéphane Payrard
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:56:06AM +0100, Stéphane Payrard wrote: > > Giving scoping functions the status of list operators > would allow to drop parentheses when not used in conjunction > with initializer so one could write: > > my $a, $b, $c; > > instead of > > my ($a, $b, $c); Too bad t