RE: NaN semantics

2001-10-09 Thread Richard_Cox
Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on 9 October 2001 09:02 wrote: > But there are going to be problems in some cases if we change the > behaviour of NaN to the perl semantics. There are cases where the IEEE > behaviour is *useful* dammit. Indeed, we certainly don't want sqrt(-1) == sqrt(-2)

RE: Custom iterators

2001-10-04 Thread Richard_Cox
Bart Lateur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on 3 October 2001 12:05 wrote: > But I really really doubt if there's any computer language in > the world C (C99 anyway[1]), C++[2], SQL99[3] to name but three [1] _Pragma, _Complex,... [2] bit_and, wchar_t, ... [3] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Richard Cox Senior S