A quick search throws up http://primes.utm.edu/prove/prove2_3.html
Which says that for/n/< 341,550,071,728,321 it is enough to test 2, 3,
5, 7, 11, 13 and 17 to be definitive (and fewer specific tries for
smaller n)
That also verifies the 75/25 figures mentioned below.
So, depending on the i
- support for automatically pulling database DSN information from a
~/.dbi (or similar) file. This is constantly re-invented poorly.
Let's just do a connect by logical application name and let the
SysAdmins sort out which DB that connects to, in a standard way.
This reminds me o
1-Apr comes in.
Create a template like the above and then DWIM::AI::Yadda will
join the dots and create the program for you !
R.
--
Richard Nuttall
Nuttall Consulting
01353 649878
www.nuttall.uk.net
and line without any
arguments, it seems obvious to me that they are intending to begin
development of a script.
On the DWIM principle, shouldn't Perl then just autoload the DWIM::AI
module and provide as output the script that they are intending to write ?
R.
--
Richard Nuttall
Nuttal
t; and "fill leftmost gaps" on
alternate lines. This produces more balanced looking columns, so they don't
all look heavier on the left.
--
Richard Nuttall
= sub{};
};
Then call &$test() as needed;
R.
--
Richard Nuttall
Nuttall Consulting
www.nuttall.uk.net
conversion between bases, and/or
strings, rather than using pack/unpack/sprintf, etc. ?
my $macaddr = '00022D3F7659';
my $hex = 16:$macaddr;
How about
$a = 'DEADBEEF';
$hexres = 16:$a + 16:FEED;
print ~16:$hexres;
does that give me "DEAEBDDC" ?
R.
--
Richard Nuttall
;
>The problem with returning undef is that undef numifies to zero.
>
Why can't it return "undef but +Inf", or "undef but NaN" for 0/0,
which would then cause a warning/error/nothing, as required by pragma,
following the "0 but true" that has been discussed previ
> I have no doubt that, once Perl 6 is available, we'll see a
> rash of modules released in the Grammar:: namespace.
> Including Grammar::Romana,
> Grammar::Klingon, Grammar::Buffy, Grammer::Mispelt, and others... :-)
Grammar::Python, Grammar::Ruby, Grammar::PHP ?
R.
> Bart Lateur:
> # On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:22:55 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> #
> # >Binary //
> # >
> # >The analogy to || is probably a bit too clever. My first reaction
> # >was it's some sort of weird division operator. But it's
> servicable.
> #
> # I think it's very cute. I think of it
Will Hyper operators work on strings as well ?
e.g.
('pic1','pic2','pic3') ^_ ('.jpg')
or even
my @images = qw( pic1 pic2 pic3) ^_ ('.jpg');
R.
--
Richard Nuttall
11 matches
Mail list logo
