- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "raptor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: println() ... printbr()
>
> > > I actually saw this in the newsgroups and thought it was a ne
> >
> > Timeouts, shouldn't be reliant on UNIX. (Although I dont think they
should
> > be in the language eigther. A system is easily developed using threads.
> > something which I hope to develop when perl6 is ready...)
> >
>
> I don't understand this paragraph.
As it stands, if you want to hav
I started writing this mail by asking:
>Does anyone else agree that perl should have support for (but not
forcefully) error handling...
>maybe a little like Java's??
>I know that sort of thing can be acheived with eval(), but surely
Which is as far as I got, because something new has oc
- Original Message -
From: "Piers Cawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: wildcard includes
> "Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > &
Just a thought, but I think it woul be a good idea to include the
'java-esqe' practice of including packages via foo.barr.*
or in Perl's case Foo::Bar::* (assume that the module include syntax remains
the same)...
I can see that in the case of some module directories, where the modules are
fairly
