No, not for
use 'strict';
That is not a bareword. Hard to say why (have short time).
Only "$a = fred" is a bareword. But "require Module", is not,
as it has another meaning, and is accomodated in the grammar.
Likewise, a prototype of sub fn(*) is not a bareword when
you call fn(Whatever).
Yes, while still allowing an explicit A()->B(), of course.
I just meant that A->B means A::->B(), or, if you would, "A"->B().
But A()->B would not change in meaning.
--tom, posting blind(ly)
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is int
Yes, Phil, I mean things like abs() meaning abs($_) and
localtime() meaning localtime(time).
Actually, combined with the paren requirement thingie, it means
localtime(time()), and localtime
has to be written localtime(). These are two different suggestions,
though.
This is an attempt at sendin
Russ, you can use "perl -" to punch/paste into that window.
But "foo | perl" would not be affected as you would not
be running interactively. Essentially, only if there
are no arguments and stdin (and stdout) areatty would you
do that.
--tom, posting blind
Visit our website at http://www.ubswar
