On Mar 10, 9:49 am, la...@wall.org (Larry Wall) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:10:29AM +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
> : Algol 68 is notorious as a failure. Let's hope things are
> : different here.
So they say:
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=site:www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD+algol-68
On Mar 10, 9:49 am, la...@wall.org (Larry Wall) wrote:
> Algol68 would have done much better had it been Open Source software...
If Algol68 was *GPL* Open-Source, then I could take the Zilog Z80
implementation Algol68C and have a HLL on my TI-84 _Pocket_ Calculator
(rather the existing choice of "
