FWIW 'has $!a handles TypeObject' is now implemented, and works fine for
roles.
It doesn't work for classes, because they have a .new method. So the
standard .new is overridden, trying to call the .new on an attribute,
but since there's no instance yet, the access to the attribute fails.
That's a
On Sat Feb 20 13:31:33 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: say False ~~ True
> rakudo ec47f3: OUTPUT«1»
> o.O
> (which is Worng)
> alpha: say False ~~ True
> alpha 30e0ed: OUTPUT«1»
> pugs: say False ~~ True
> pugs: OUTPUT«»
> * masak submits rakudobug
> can't believe no-one caught this before
On Wed Apr 08 14:59:19 2009, moritz wrote:
> 23:55 <@moritz_> rakudo: my @a = 1..4; say @a[1..*].perl
> 23:56 < p6eval> rakudo 6b9755: OUTPUT«[2, 3, 4, undef]»
>
> It should just be [2, 3, 4].
Since the discussion came up on #perl6 if this is really the expected
behaviour, S09 says:
As the end-
On Sun Jun 21 12:05:11 2009, moritz wrote:
> 21:03 <@moritz_> rakudo: my @a = 1, 2, 4; sub f($a) { say $a };
> f(|@a[*-1..*-1])
> 21:03 < p6eval> rakudo 1b06df: OUTPUT«argument doesn't arrayin sub f
> (/tmp/2x4tmnOO68:1)called from Main (/tmp/2x4tmnOO68:2)»
>
I investigated a b
On Sun Dec 07 07:24:07 2008, masak wrote:
> The .subst method in Rakudo r33599 can understand :x()...
>
> $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :x(2))' # yes
> bar1bar2foo3foo4
>
> ...and :nth()...
>
> $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :nth(2))' # yes
> foo1
On Wed Nov 19 07:35:48 2008, masak wrote:
> what should the behaviour of sign($x) be when $x is complex?
I'd argue that it's a Failure.
If you care about complex numbers, you usually want an angle instead,
which you can get with Complex.polar. (And it's easier to give it a
another meaning later t
