There's a 'minmax' operator in S03. Is this coherent with that?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:51 PM, wrote:
> Author: colomon
> Date: 2010-04-27 01:51:12 +0200 (Tue, 27 Apr 2010)
> New Revision: 30480
>
> Modified:
> docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
> Log:
> [Spec] Add .minmax m
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Saravanan Thiyagarajan
wrote:
> Would like to be a volunteer in working for perl-6.
> Can some one help me to get into right direction ?
This is how I did it: http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=780001
Kyle.
On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I'm pleased to announce
the August 2009 development release of Rakudo Perl #20 "PDX".
Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Parrot Virtual Machine [1].
The tarball for the August 2009 release is available from
http://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/download
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Damian Conway wrote:
> Moritz wrote:
>
>> However it seems we have to pay a price: each act of rendering a Pod
>> file actually means executing the program that's being documented (at
>> least the BEGIN blocks and other stuff that happens at compile time),
>> with
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
> * The DOC statement prefix constrains any block to which it is applied
> (including BEGIN, CHECK, INIT and similar) to run only if -doc is
> specified on the commandline
>
> * You can tell if you're running under -doc by checking $
use v6;
my $s; # ! $x.defined
my @a; # @a.defined
That's the current Rakudo behavior. RT #64968 suggests that this is a
bug. In Perl 5, @a would not be defined until something was put into
it. Which should it be? I'd like to write a test for this.
Thanks.
Kyle.
Rakudo Light
Rakudo Star Light
Rakudo Rock Star
Rakudo Hard Rock
Rakudo Play Hard
Rakudo Play
Just musing...
In Rakudo right now, this lives: "{$foo;$^foo}(1)"
However, the spec test expects it to die during compilation (see the
end of S06-signature/positional-placeholders.t). It says, "A
non-twigil variable should not precede a corresponding twigil
variable."
In Rakudo right now, this says 3: sub fo
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> (Note to the bored: feel free to beat me to adding something like these last
> two to the spectests...I'm away for the afternoon/evening.)
In r27483, I added these tests to S12-methods/multi.t:
http://dev.pugscode.org/changeset/27483
My patchwork readings lead me to believe I could test Perl 6's
tie-like feature with something like the below code, which I don't
expect to even compile, what with '???' in places. My question is:
am I on the right track? Obviously there are details I haven't nailed
down, and any guidance would b
10 matches
Mail list logo
