system access
pattern for it (in addition to whatever specific functionality it
needs) makes sense, IMHO.
Doesn't it make sense to just make it a method for the class/role?
my Amazon $fn .= open("$path-to-input-file-location/$file-name", :r) or
die $!;
--
Kevan Benson
A-1 Networks
Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Kevan Benson wrote:
That said, I submit that it's a very confusing part of the language as
defined currently, and I haven't seen a very thorough explanation of the
purpose of each method in the chain the instantiates a new ob
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Kevan Benson wrote:
Should there not be a way to define object constructors with custom
signatures that can be usefully invoked like a normal constructor?
Currently, defining a BUILD method for a class with a specific signature
doesn't seem to allow for the object
rote:
I'm confused. The signature of initialize is used by Class.new in
Ruby; the signature of __init__ is used by class_name() in Python...
How is doing the same thing too much magic? Or am I misunderstanding
the suggestion?
On 8/19/09, Kevan Benson wrote:
Should there not be a way to d
d
the room.
(2009-08-19 12:06:30) masak: Kentrak: only the other day, I found out
that you can easily create a new() multimethod which does delegation
using callsame(|$args) or nextsame(|$args). that might be what you want.
(2009-08-19 12:06:36) Kentrak: jnthn: yes, aware of that, looking for a
way to not have to redefine multiple pieces to accomplish what I think
should be a simple feat, defining an initializer with custom params
--
-Kevan Benson
-A-1 Networks
