fic purposes of this thread, going
the TPF route may not be the most efficient way to accomplish that goal.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:23 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:25:42 Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
>
>
> I could take a month's sabbatical from my day job for $5000 without losing
> insurance coverage or other benefits. That's sli
elp. I
don't get the tax write off but I know where my money is going.
In closing, what we don't need is something to fight over. Hopefully you
will find the sweet spot - I sure hope you do.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
uated as it is
parsed while some require additional homegrown code to parse the resulting
parse tree (data structure).
I have not had a chance to look at Flavio's links yet. Since no one who
actually knows rules seemed to be inspired to write an example for me - I
will *eventually* figure it out on my own and post back to the list as an
FYI.
Paul Seamons
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
run in Perl 5 today
without needing Pugs or Parrot.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 4/4/06, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:16:23AM -0400, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
>
Junctions are not intended for that use. We have Sets for that now.
Ok. So this will work out of the box if you use the right tool. Cool.
The cabal alrea
, etc
without creating your own infix operator?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
repository
to the public http://use.perl.org/~nicholas/journal/24649 but is anyone else
working on the project? With the excitement of Perl6, Parrot, and Pugs I
wonder if Ponie is being neglected.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
l experience they are
prevalent.
--
> H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 10/24/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/24/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
>
>
This really isn't a fear as much as it is a complaint. It has to do with
of date.
We don't have a single source where people can go for relatively "up to the
minute" facts concerning the project.
Juerd
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
al parameter that would specify behavior
-min (zip to the smallest list)
-undef (insert undefs as needed)
-error (blow up if the lists are not equal in size)
etc
Juerd
>
Just my 2 cents from the peanut gallery.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
this in long tight running loops and found that the ways to achieve
it (as shown above) are worse then leaving the op in.
Michele
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 6/17/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:56:50AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> :
> : my $x = 3;
> : my $y = \$x;
> : say $y + 10;
> : $y++;
> : say $y;
> : say $x;
> :
> I suspect people will find that counterintuitive. A more consiste
which is determined by previous read
In p5, you need to keep track of your offset and skip that number of
bytes each time. It would be nice if p6 could somehow make that
easier. Again, my focus is on the design docs and not on pack/unpack.
I just used it as a discussion point since it is what I was working
on at the time.
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
lue i.e. $string.packed, comment about the
'packed' warnings/strictures pragma, and stick it the "right" place.
The patch to S09 has me stumped.
Is there any other reference material I can use to put together solid
frameworks that are closely representative to what @larry might
produce?
> Pm
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
On 6/10/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I
> have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in
> docs and be a pioneer.
Ok, are there any guidelines for what should and should not be
that
patches had been requested with a volunteer to act as the approving
authority.
Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I
have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in
docs and be a pioneer.
>
> Pm
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
ite access to be limited to @larry
initially. The community posts patches where the bulk of the work is
done and @larry makes any necessary modifications and commits. If
even that work load proves to be too much, perhaps common mortals get
granted commit access on a case-by-case basis.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Gat
(240) 568-5675
t know anything about unicode and leaving
the hard choices for doing the "right thing" up to you all. Whatever
the "right thing" is, will there be a way to do what my code snippet
showed?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
utoconvert but forget it ever
happened, and 1 would be an outright failure.
Ok - so could someone set me straight?
What should that code snippet do? Would it do anything different if
Int had been int?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
dea of having mutator and non-mutator versions of chomp (and
other functions) have been kicked around the list.
Any definitive word yet?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
value can
change.
sub some_rourtine {
state $foo = 42;
return $foo++;
}
My apologies if this has been previously discussed or is documented
somewhere. I am still playing catch up. Ok, ok - it's true - I am
looking for a little instant gratification.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
On 5/4/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok - this isn't what I was expecting at all. That doesn't make it a
> > bad thing. Given something that looks a lot more like a typical
> >
On 5/4/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So without asking for S17 in its entirety to be written, is it
> > possible to get a synopsis of how p6 will do coroutines? I ask
> > because after re
a coroutine", it is
clear there is more than one way to dictate behavior.
http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000178.html
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
from
where I am sitting - you all are the ones that have done the hard
work. Having answered the questions enough times in p5 circles
though, it would be nice to have a real simple easy answer for p6.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
to find out what, if anything, is the proper way
to do what I want. The worst that could happen is that I find out
there isn't a way to get a what matched from an any() eq any()
comparison.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
> @array { ... }
is what I think it might be modeling it after the for
loop, but the closest thing I see for while is:
while =$*IN -> $line {...}
I am happy to write tests to get the appropriate
functionality in Pugs, but I am not sure what is
appropriate???
Cheers,
Joshua Gatc
> @array { ... }
is what I think it might be modeling it after the for
loop, but the closest thing I see in while is:
while =$*IN -> $line {...}
I am happy to write tests to get the appropriate
functionality in Pugs, but I am not sure what is
appropriate???
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
--- Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb accidentally introduced a dependency
> on
> Config::IniFiles. Since it is implemented in pure
> perl he offered to
> add it to the repository. Warnock applies.
>
> http://xrl.us/div3
In the note offeri
31 matches
Mail list logo
