On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Timothy S. Nelson
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jon Lang wrote:
>
>> I definitely prefer Markdown's approach to "inline markup" over POD's
>> approach: e.g., _italic_ strikes me as much more legible than
>> I.
>
> That's one of the things that's always annoy
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, John Gabriele wrote:
> Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to
> {snip}
Gah. Sorry for the quasi-double-post. I posted on google groups, it
didn't show up, then I jumped the gun and posted a similar message to
the ML.
---John
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Mark Overmeer wrote:
> * John Gabriele (jmg3...@gmail.com) [100209 14:31]:
>> [Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
>> [Pandoc]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/
>> [reST]: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
&
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to
it, and deserves a doc markup format that's also natural: [Markdown]
(and [Pandoc]'s Markdown has just the right additions, IMO).
[Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
[Pandoc]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural and
well-worn feel to it, and deserves a doc markup format that also feels
natural. What works very well for me is [Markdown] (and [Pandoc]'s
Markdown has mostly just the right additions, IMO).
[Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/proje
