Re: POD <-> Code entanglement

2007-06-16 Thread John Beppu
For what it's worth, I'm a fan of the notation that NaturalDocs uses. Function: Multiply Multiplies two integers. Parameters: x - The first integer. y - The second integer. Returns: The two integers multiplied together. See Also: http://www.naturaldocs.org/

Re: relational language extension (was Re: request new Mapping|Hash operators)

2007-03-29 Thread John Beppu
Good luck w/ your studies. Viable alternatives to SQL are always welcome. ;-) On 3/23/07, Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 7:15 PM -0700 3/23/07, John Beppu wrote: >You might find Dee interesting: > >http://www.quicksort.co.uk/ This Dee project in Python is a

Re: request new Mapping|Hash operators

2007-03-23 Thread John Beppu
You might find Dee interesting: http://www.quicksort.co.uk/ A relational language extension for Python Inspired by 'The Third Manifesto', a book by Chris Date and Hugh Darwen, we're putting forward an implementation of a truly relational language using Python (Dee). We address two problems: 1.

Re: pitching names for the attribute for a function with no memor y or side effects

2001-03-31 Thread John BEPPU
[ date ] 2001/03/30 | Friday | 11:16 PM [ author ] John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Russ Allbery wrote: > > gcc and the literature both use "pure"; I'd recommend that. John Porter wrote: > I like pure too, but I'm afraid the nuance of it will be > completely lost on non-Functional programmers.