annot in standard Perl programming. This is not to say
one can't do functional programming in Perl, or anything of the like.
However, considering context in which most Perl is written, "pure" has no
meaning, and hence I wouldn't consider it "correct".
--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
ure, "pure" might be a good name. But in
a non-functional context, the name has little meaning with regards to the
concept of "nosideeffects".
--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
Garrett Goebel, at 18:47 -0500 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote:
> The only acceptable code name other than "Perl6" is "YACN" ;)
Given all this chatter, YAP might be better. You get 1 guess for what "P"
stands for. (No it's not Python).
--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
#x27; RFC.
(Please don't take this to mean I'm still really really trying to push the
RFC; the above I meant to write concerning RFC's in general).
--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
which are highly unpopular. The frozen state, I felt,
means I don't feel there was much more meaningful input to improve the
quality of the RFC. Of course, my interpretation of these values for the
Status: field is not necessarily the best one.
As Buddha noted, as I originally intended, I reque
> process is a *>HUGE<* mistake.
If this is a valid argument, then why not just use comments insetad of
POD? XML does require some more work, granted. But it pays off.
--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
