Ok, so 0 returns the empty list and -1 violates the signature? In PIR
can we have such signatures that put a constraint on the range of
values for a given parameter?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Carl Mäsak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason (>):
>> It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you
If someone wants to make the final word on what the behavior should be
I can go ahead and implement it.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Jonathan Scott Duff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:38 AM, TSa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> HaloO,
>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>>> In Per
this
correct? I ask because in the current Rakudo implementation it returns
the Match object (what I would expect from the "one low-level run of
the regex engine").
Best Regards,
-Chris
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008
roups/) should return a List of
Match.
I expected the S29 definition when first approaching $string.match I
feel it is more intuitive than what happens with S05. Could someone
clarify what the behavior should be?
Best Regards,
-Chris Davaz
