Re: A6: Signature zones and such

2003-03-14 Thread Brad Hughes
Piers Cawley wrote: [...] Nope, send it to TPF as discussed. It's what I've said in all the summaries after all. I just hope that a chunk of it ends up in Larry's pocket. Does anyone know if TPF is set up to allow earmarked contributions? brad

Re: In defense of zero-indexed arrays.

2002-12-06 Thread Brad Hughes
Damien Neil wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:45:39AM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: Explain how having indexes (arrays, substr, etc...) in Perl 6 start at 0 will benefit most users. Do not invoke legacy. [1] Answer 1: Ignoring legacy, it won't. Bingo. Answer 2: Because C uses 0-based i

Re: Unicode operators

2002-11-07 Thread Brad Hughes
Flaviu Turean wrote: [...] 5. if you want to wait for the computing platforms before programming in p6, then there is quite a wait ahead. how about platforms which will never catch up? VMS, anyone? Not to start an OS war thread or anything, but why do people still have this mistaken impression o

Re: Fw: perl6 operator precedence table

2002-10-10 Thread Brad Hughes
Larry Wall wrote: [...] > Maybe we should ... to mean "and so on forever": > > @a[0...; 0...:10; 0...:100] > > Except then we couldn't use it to mean what Ruby means by it, which > might be handier in real life. No more yada-yada-yada? Brad

Re: So, we need a code name...

2001-05-03 Thread Brad Hughes
Larry Wall wrote: [...] > Then Perl language variants could go the other way and be: > > PermMicro Perl > PernNano Perl > PeroJava Perl > PerpPython Perl > PerqQuick Perl > PerrRuby Perl > PersStrict Perl > Pe

Re: RFC 226 (v2) Selective interpolation in single quotish context.

2000-09-27 Thread Brad Hughes
The story so far: On September 13 Jarkko professed a desire for "a quotish context that would be otherwise like q() but with some minimal extra typing I could mark a scalar or an array to be expanded as in qq()." [1] Seeing this as being especially useful for those of us creating comma

Re: RFC 85 (v2) All perl generated errors should have a unique identifier

2000-09-20 Thread Brad Hughes
Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: [...] > =head1 TITLE > > All perl generated errors should have a unique identifier > [...] > An id string could have some structure associated to enable > better handling. One suggestion was to follow the lead of VMS. > > facility: > The program

Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in single quotish context.

2000-09-14 Thread Brad Hughes
Damian Conway wrote: > > Why not just give \I..\E a special "turn-on-interpolation" meaning in > q{} docs? > > $code = ' > > $x = $y; > @a = (1..10); > $name = \I$funcname\E; > > # etc. > > '; > > Damian Yes. M

Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in single quotish context.

2000-09-14 Thread Brad Hughes
Michael G Schwern wrote: [...] > Personally, I'd solve this with sprintf(): > > print F sprintf <<'END', $filename; > $! > $! execute a.com, copy and purge > $! > $ @sys$login:a.com > $ copy %s sys$login:*.* > $ purge sys$login:$filename > $! > $ exit > > but

Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridable for easy debugging

2000-09-13 Thread Brad Hughes
Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > > This reminds me of a related but rather opposite desire I have had > > more than once: a quotish context that would be otherwise like q() but > > with some minimal extra typing I could mark a scalar or an array to be > > expanded as in qq(). > > I have wanted that

Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip()

2000-08-11 Thread Brad Hughes
Andy Wardley wrote: > > > I know other languages call it zip, but personally I dislike that name > > as zip() is commonly used with reference to compression. Although > > I do not have a good alternative. > > fold() and unfold()? > > merge() and cleave()? > > A collate() and ...?

Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =>

2000-08-10 Thread Brad Hughes
Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: [...] > This RFC proposes the introduction of a new data type -- the I [...] I hereby propose that all current Perl 6 Project Plan deadlines be extended 3 months so that Damian has more time to come up with gems like this. I have no idea if it ultimately makes sense or

Re: Error handling

2000-08-08 Thread Brad hughes
"Bryan C. Warnock" wrote: > On Tue, 08 Aug 2000, Peter Bevan wrote: [...] > > Error handling should be supported by it's own keyword > i.e.: > > > trap { > > #CODE > > } > > release (error) { > > # ERROR > > } > > > > (just because I didn't want to steal throw and catch) > > Why not? Throw