Quoth tho...@sandlass.de ("TSa (Thomas =?utf-8?q?Sandla=C3=9F?=)"):
>
> Here is a direct syntax for the freeze feature of the paper:
>
> class C does T1 does T2
> {
> freeze T1::x for foo;
> freeze T2::x for bar;
> method x {...} # for all other methods
> }
>
> The implem
At 6PM +0200 on 11/08/09 you (Moritz Lenz) wrote:
> Ben Morrow wrote:
> >
> > However, I would much rather see a general syntax like
> >
> > (# ... )
> > {# ... }
> > [# ... ]
> >
> > with no whitespace allowed between the
Sorry for the delay in replying, but I was busy with other things and I
wanted to give other people a chance to reply. Since noone has, might it
be possible to get the attached patches committed? I'm not familiar with
the protocol for such things so, again, I'm sorry if I've got it wrong.
Ben
---
Quoth markjr...@gmail.com (Mark J. Reed):
>
> I still like the double-bracket idea. I don't much mind the extra
> character; 5 characters total still beats the 7 of HTML/XML.
I much prefer double-bracket to double-#: double-# gets caught out when
you do s/^/# on code which already includes line-s
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Ben Morrow wrote:
- Presumably when an exception is thrown through a block, the LEAVE and
POST queues are called (in that order).
POST was inspired from the Design By Contract department, and are meant
to execute assertions on the result. If you leave a block through an
I'm iworking on a patch for Perl 5 that implements the Perl 6 closure
traits (ENTER/LEAVE/...) as special blocks. There are several details
that aren't clear to me from either S04 or the spec tests; I apologize
if these have been discussed before, as I haven't been following p6l.
I'm also not subsc
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall):
> I should also mention I did (briefly) consider the "null" reduce
> operator:
>
> [] zip(1,2;3,4)
>
> to mean "slap [] around each element", but it runs into ambiguity with
> the existing [] form indicating an empty list.
Would using [[]] instead work?
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Thomas Wittek wrote:
> > Jonathan Lang schrieb:
> > > IMHO, syntax should be left alone until a compelling reason to change
> > > it is found. While I think it would be nice to have a more intuitive
> > > name for grep
> > What
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Mark J. Reed"):
> On 8/17/06, David Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >$a=[1, 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > >$c=[1, 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > >$d=[1, 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > >
> > >So $a, $c, and $d may all have the same *value*
> > >(or "snapshot", when eval
