Ok, this might be useless, but maybe you like to know:
All tests successful, 1 test and 64 subtests skipped.
Files=135, Tests=2252, 798 wallclock secs (299.99 cusr + 96.80 csys =
396.79 CPU)
On a PIII 1Ghz/256MB RAM, running Slackware Linux
Cheers,
Alberto
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On behalf of the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
( Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(
( > If we are in the mood of changing operators, && can be /\
( > and || can be \/. At least, mathematicians will like it!
(
( You are, of course,
If we are in the mood of changing operators, && can be /\
and || can be \/. At least, mathematicians will like it!
Cheers
Albie
--
| Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://numexp.sourceforge.net |
Hi!
Is there any possibility to discuss operators from apocalypse 3?
Here goes my thoughts:
1) ?: operator is very common to C programmers and should not be
changed to ??::. I agree that the ':' can be usefull out there,
but, if we change ?: to ()?
