Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: f617adfbac7b76612bf35c5e2c3cea58b7852e16
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/f617adfbac7b76612bf35c5e2c3cea58b7852e16
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen
Date: 2013-10-01 (Tue, 01 Oct 2013)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 3d9eda78f63f341de64334daa3e3079300ab3c93
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/3d9eda78f63f341de64334daa3e3079300ab3c93
Author: Larry Wall
Date: 2013-10-01 (Tue, 01 Oct 2013)
Changed paths:
M S05-reg
There are two issues here.
a) Using language in a consistent manner in Perl6 space
- the word 'specification' is used in Perl6 space both in the way it has
become acceptable in computer language design circles, but also in a new
and more nuanced way in Perl6.
- Perl6 is being developed using La
Minor corrections:
> may smply be my personal limitations).
s/smply/simply/
> dumb "noob" questions.
By my fairly harsh definition.
> with the sage of IBM's attempt to develop One Language To Rule Them All,
s/sage/saga/
I suspect there are copy-paste errors on the "delete" sections of the new text:
... the
+normal way to test for existence is to apply the C<:delete> adverb to a
+subscripting operation.
The ":delete" adverb tests for existence?
-y
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:09 AM, GitHub wrote:
> Branch: refs
