[perl #113930] Lexical subs

2012-07-09 Thread Father Chrysostomos via RT
On Sun Jul 08 02:13:13 2012, thoughtstream wrote: > Father Chrysostomos pointed out: > > > I said when, not whether. :-) > > Isn't that just typical of me: confusing ontology with chronology. ;-) > > I'm afraid don't know the implementation details for Rakudo. It may be > bound as the surroundin

Re: When do named subs bind to their variables? [perl #113930]

2012-07-09 Thread Father Chrysostomos via RT
On Sat Jul 07 22:23:16 2012, thoughtstream wrote: > Father Chrysostomos asked: > > > What I am really trying to find out is when the subroutine is actually > > cloned, > > Yes. It is supposed to be (or at least must *appear* to be), > and currently is (or appears to be) in Rakudo. I said when, n

When do named subs bind to their variables? (Re: Questionable scope of state variables ([perl #113930] Lexical subs))

2012-07-09 Thread Father Chrysostomos via RT
I’m forwarding this to the Perl 6 language list, so see if I can find an answer there. [This conversation is about how lexical subs should be implemented in Perl 5. What Perl 6 does may help in determining how to iron out the edge cases.] On Sat Jul 07 13:23:17 2012, sprout wrote: > On Sat Jul 0

Re: When do named subs bind to their variables? (Re: Questionable scope of state variables ([perl #113930] Lexical subs))

2012-07-09 Thread Father Chrysostomos via RT
On Sat Jul 07 18:35:03 2012, tom christiansen wrote: > "Father Chrysostomos via RT" wrote >on Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:44:46 PDT: > > > I’m forwarding this to the Perl 6 language list, so see if I can > find > > an answer there. > > I do have an answer from Damian, which I will enclose below, and