On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 08:44:30AM -0500, B. Estrade wrote:
>
>
> Realistically, that's not going to happen. The internals of the Perl 5
> interpreter are not flexible enough to implement a lot of the features
> that
> Perl 6 has that Perl
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 03:38:48PM +0800, Xiao Yafeng wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 08:44:30AM -0500, B. Estrade wrote:
> >
> >
> > Realistically, that's not going to happen. The internals of the Perl 5
> > interpreter are not flexib
> There are a lot of programmers who know several programming languages already,
> and who don't want to read a whole page on how to print 'Hello World', 5
> pages on
> if-statements and while-loops and another 10 pages explaining lists and
> iteration.
However experienced a programmer may be,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 05:34:18AM +0530, Siddhant Saraf wrote:
> Rakud[o] is not _the_ reference implementation of Perl 6. Actually, there is
> no reference implementation for Perl 6. There never will be. Whoever wants
> to make a perl6 implementation is free to do so. Just follow the spec and
> y