On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
>Hi. I'm wondering if any thought has been given to natural language
> processing with Perl 6 grammars.
>
>
Yes.
;)
--
Aaron Sherman
Email or GTalk: a...@ajs.com
http://www.ajs.com/~ajs
This is getting more and more off topic, but if you want some lojban
pasers, start at
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Dictionaries,+Glossers+and+parsers
-y
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Jason (>):
>> No specific tool is best suited for natural language pro
Carl (>>), Moritz (>):
>> * If it isn't allowed, which of the two steps is disallowed?
>> *Detaching* a method containing references to private accessor slots
>> (thereby extending the syntactic restriction of "no private accessors
>> outside of the class block"), or *attaching* an anonymous method
Jason (>):
> No specific tool is best suited for natural language processing. There was
> apparently a time in which everyone thought that a formal grammar could
> clearly define any natural language, but I don't think anyone succeeded at
> creating a complete formal grammar for any language other
Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Offer Kaye wrote:
>> The link to the S26 Synopsis on http://perlcabal.org/syn/ points to
>> http://perlcabal.org/syn/S26.html which is a broken link - would it be
>> possible to fix this?
>
> I't not that easy, because we currently don't have tool to turn p6doc
> into HTML. I c
HaloO,
On Monday, 2. August 2010 20:02:40 Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jonathan Worthington
wrote:
> > No, given-when is smart-matching. The RHS of a smart-match decides what
> > happens. If you do True ~~ 1 then that's 1.ACCEPTS(True) which is going
> > to do +True and
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jonathan Worthington
> wrote:
>> No, given-when is smart-matching. The RHS of a smart-match decides what
>> happens. If you do True ~~ 1 then that's 1.ACCEPTS(True) which is going to
>> do +True and thus match.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> No, given-when is smart-matching. The RHS of a smart-match decides what
> happens. If you do True ~~ 1 then that's 1.ACCEPTS(True) which is going to
> do +True and thus match.
OK, but what about 0 ~~ True? That's what started this thr
Hi,
Offer Kaye wrote:
> Following the release of Rakudo Star I've been playing around with
> learning Perl 6 and noticed a distinct lack of user-facing
> documentation. After some IRC chats with pmichaud++ I thought it would
> be a good idea if I got the ball rolling, assuming of course it
> doesn
Hi,
Offer Kaye wrote:
> The link to the S26 Synopsys on http://perlcabal.org/syn/ points to
> http://perlcabal.org/syn/S26.html which is a broken link - would it be
> possible to fix this?
I't not that easy, because we currently don't have tool to turn p6doc
into HTML. I can remove the link for n
Carl Mäsak wrote:
> * It is my feeling that such encapsulation-breakage shouldn't be
> allowed. Do you agree, p6l?
Time may proof me wrong, but I think it's not such a big issue.
Note that encapsulation can be broken in many ways already, wither with
MONKEY_TYPING or by using introspection techni
11 matches
Mail list logo
