On 2010-05-26, at 8:52 am, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:22:36AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> : On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 00:53, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : > sub MAIN(:name(:$n))
> : > then $n has two names, 'name' and 'n', and we could consider all
> one-letter
> : > parameter names as s
Author: sorear
Date: 2010-05-28 02:10:37 +0200 (Fri, 28 May 2010)
New Revision: 30878
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] clarify :ratchet behavior with input from pmichaud++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
Jon Lang wrote:
> Right. Still, there are times when duck-typing, flawed as it is,
> might be exactly what is needed to resolve the problem at hand. I
> forget who or in what context, but I vaguely recall someone posting an
> article here that proposed the use of £ in signatures as a modifier to
Darren Duncan wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>>
>> Or going the other direction, perhaps we're missing a primitive that
>> can produce a data structure with the type information stripped, and
>> then eqv might be able to determine structural equivalence between
>> two canonicalized values.
>
> Often yo
Larry Wall wrote:
Or going the other direction, perhaps we're missing a primitive that
can produce a data structure with the type information stripped, and
then eqv might be able to determine structural equivalence between
two canonicalized values.
Often you still want to know the declared type
