On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:09:49PM -0600, David Green wrote:
: On 2010-05-26, at 1:53 am, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: >> The tests might need fixing too, since I'm not sure whether eqv (as used
by is_deeply) would cover that, or whether it would take a separate test in
bool context.
: >
: > probably th
On 2010-05-26, at 1:53 am, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> The tests might need fixing too, since I'm not sure whether eqv (as used by
>> is_deeply) would cover that, or whether it would take a separate test in
>> bool context.
>
> probably the latter.
I guess it would have to -- that is, "but" creates a
Author: colomon
Date: 2010-05-26 21:29:50 +0200 (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 30821
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
Log:
[spec] Add Real.Int, Real.Rat, Real.Num, and Real.Complex to the spec.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
===
Author: moritz
Date: 2010-05-26 19:57:01 +0200 (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 30813
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] typo
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.po
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-05-26 19:21:03 +0200 (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 30812
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] explain how not-raising works on != and ne
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
==
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-05-26 18:55:57 +0200 (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 30811
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] attempt to clarify :nth and :x
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spe
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:22:36AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 00:53, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: > The spec doesn't elaborate on how the short args are specified in the
: > signature of MAIN. I see two possible approaches (that don't contradict):
: >
: > 1) one renames them in the
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 00:53, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> The spec doesn't elaborate on how the short args are specified in the
> signature of MAIN. I see two possible approaches (that don't contradict):
>
> 1) one renames them in the signature, so it would like
>
> sub MAIN(:name(:$n))
>
> then $n has
Hi David,
thanks for your contribution. I'll review it thoroughly in the next few
days.
Am 24.05.2010 21:14, schrieb David Green:
Also the line that sets the "but False" variations is commented out for now,
because "but" isn't working.
That's a reason why the challenge included only the si
