Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model (nntp: message 5 of 20)

2010-05-13 Thread Jason Switzer
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:59 AM, wrote: > This should be a reply to Daniel Ruoso's post above, but I cannot persuade > my nntp reader > to reply to a post made before I subscribed here. Sorry > > And at the core of that, is the need for preemptive (kernel) threading and > shared memory. > > These

Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model (nntp: message 5 of 20)

2010-05-13 Thread nigelsandever
This should be a reply to Daniel Ruoso's post above, but I cannot persuade my nntp reader to reply to a post made before I subscribed here. Sorry On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:16:35 +0100, Daniel Ruoso wrote: I have 3 main problems with your thinking. 1: You are conflating two fundamentally differe

r30621 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2010-05-13 Thread pugs-commits
Author: moritz Date: 2010-05-13 10:50:56 +0200 (Thu, 13 May 2010) New Revision: 30621 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod Log: [S06] fill empty section with a reference to what we have about that topic Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod ==